In Izmir, the creditors of a company lawyer , went to the house where the borrower owes all their belongings haczedip harassment against the family and asked to apply pressure .
Harassment and repression against the bailiff can not be established to the family did not stating foreclosure process . Creditor lawyers onto it subject to the Supreme Court moved , but the Supreme Court 12th Civil Chamber of the debtor to harass and put pressure to pay the enforcement of fundamental rights and freedoms protection contrary to the principle stating that the creditor attorney's application refused. Decisions were harassed and oppressed was a precedent for thousands of borrowers .
Creditors of a company in Izmir lawyer , went to the house where the borrower owes all their belongings haczedip harassment against the family and asked to apply pressure . All goods can not be done bailiff seizure , harassment and repression against the family did not dry , indicating whether the process of foreclosures . On this subject the creditor's lawyer moved the Supreme Court . Appeals evaluating the Supreme Court 12th Civil Chamber of the seizure of the purpose of debt collection to ensure that the debtor harassing and put pressure to pay the enforcement of fundamental rights and freedoms protection contrary to the principle that it considered a crime , said creditor lawyer's application refused. This decision of the Supreme Court , was harassed and persecuted by creditors owed thousands was not a precedent for . REPRESENTS A CRIME
working in a private company in Izmir, K. Ramadan , the received in installments of electronics firms unable to repay creditors, foreclosure proceedings were started . Creditors of the firm's lawyers , beside taking enforcement officer went to the home of the borrower . Lien creditor behaving during the oppressive family lawyer , but also supplies abusive words, whether the foreclosure process asked for all things . The attitude of lawyers react to creditors executive officer, executive opined that under these conditions can not execute their operations were separated from the scene . Executive officer of enforcement proceedings on the creditor's lawyer not to make the matter was brought to the Supreme Court . The lawyer's request to assess the Supreme Court 12 Law Department, \"Confiscation The purpose of debt collection to ensure and debtor to harass or put pressure paid force for the purpose of foreclosure should be avoided. This type of behavior , fundamental rights and freedoms protection policy also contradicts . Again, this type of behavior, Bankruptcy Law 85/constitutes a crime according to the last item . Additionally, the home foreclosure process can have more than one goods saying, \"the lawyer refused to creditors . This decision of the Supreme Court , verbally abused and oppressed by creditors who had set a precedent for thousands of people .